In a recent post on LinkedIn, Kevin Gaither argues that elected officials we see on TV are not real leaders. He compares them to sales leaders who act like "dingbats" in the workforce. Kevin believes real sales leaders prioritize honesty and transparency, actively listen to their team members, and encourage creative solutions. They take responsibility for their actions, celebrate collective achievements, and treat their team members with respect and professionalism.

In contrast, Kevin argues that elected officials interrupt discussions, dismiss the ideas of others, lie or lack transparency, say one thing and do another, disrespect other teammates in public, perpetuate negativity, place the blame on others, and take credit for the success of their team. These behaviors erode trust and confidence in elected officials, making it difficult for them to effectively serve their constituents.

Kevin's post highlights the importance of servant leadership, a leadership style that prioritizes the common good and serving the people. It is a stark contrast to power-hungry politicians who prioritize their own interests and special interests over the public interest.

According to a survey conducted by Pew Research Center, public confidence in government performance is at an all-time low. Only 20% of Americans trust the federal government to do what is right always or most of the time. Partisan divisions, skepticism of government officials, and frustration with the political process are contributing factors to this lack of trust.

As citizens, we have a responsibility to hold our elected officials accountable for their job performance and actions. We must demand more empathy, responsibility, and compromise from our representatives. By doing so, we can bridge the partisan divide and rebuild public confidence in our government and democracy.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the primary differences between elected and appointed leaders?

Elected leaders are chosen by the people through an election process, while appointed leaders are selected by other officials or a governing body. Elected leaders are accountable to the public, while appointed leaders are accountable to the officials who appointed them. Elected leaders often have a fixed term, while appointed leaders can serve for an indefinite period.

How does the appointment process for government officials work?

The appointment process for government officials varies depending on the position. Generally, the process involves a nomination by the president or governor, followed by confirmation by the Senate or a similar body. The appointment process is designed to ensure that the appointed official is qualified and capable of performing the duties of the position.

What are the perceived advantages of having appointed leaders instead of elected ones?

Appointed leaders are often seen as more qualified and experienced than elected leaders. They are not subject to the pressures of an election campaign and can focus on the job at hand. Appointed leaders can also be removed from their position more easily if they fail to perform their duties effectively.

In what ways do elected judges differ from appointed judges in their roles and responsibilities?

Elected judges are chosen by the people through an election process, while appointed judges are selected by other officials or a governing body. Elected judges are accountable to the public, while appointed judges are accountable to the officials who appointed them. Elected judges often have a fixed term, while appointed judges can serve for an indefinite period.

Can you provide examples of positions typically held by appointed officials?

Examples of positions typically held by appointed officials include cabinet secretaries, ambassadors, federal judges, and agency heads.

How do the roles and accountability of elected leaders compare to those of non-elected officials?

Elected leaders are accountable to the public and must answer to their constituents. Non-elected officials, on the other hand, are accountable to the officials who appointed them. Elected leaders have a mandate to represent the interests of their constituents, while non-elected officials are expected to carry out the policies and directives of their superiors.